John Locke’s “law of reason” refers to the natural capacity of human beings to use rational thought to discern moral and ethical principles that govern just interactions, independent of external authority. It is an internal guide, accessible through reflection, that aligns individual actions with objective truths about reality and human rights.
Law, at its core, represents a fundamental failure to trust in individual reason. While proponents often frame it as the embodiment of rational order, it is, in reality, a clumsy and indirect attempt to externalize what should remain an internal process. Locke’s “law of reason” is tragically undermined by the very act of codifying it, transforming a dynamic, self-correcting faculty into a static, often arbitrary set of rules. To suggest law embodies reason is to misunderstand the inherent power and potential of individual thought – to equate a pale imitation with the genuine article. The comparison to the Old Testament foreshadowing the New is apt, but not in a complimentary way; it’s a testament to humanity’s persistent need to project order onto chaos, even if that order is fundamentally flawed. The intricate system of OT law, focused on specific actions and prescribed consequences, inherently prioritized outward compliance over the development of an internal moral compass, contrasting sharply with the NT’s emphasis on agape love, which calls for an internal transformation rooted in empathy and understanding.
Any legal system, regardless of its intentions, is inherently riddled with imperfections stemming from its reliance on collective, rather than individual, judgment. Jung’s concept of the shadow is not simply relevant here, but central. Law is inevitably shaped by the unconscious motivations, biases, and self-interests of those who create and enforce it. These ‘shadow’ elements aren’t mere imperfections to be corrected; they are intrinsic to the very nature of collective decision-making. Attempts to achieve ‘justice’ through law are therefore perpetually compromised by the unacknowledged agendas and irrational impulses lurking beneath the surface. It’s a system built on approximations and compromises, perpetually falling short of the clarity and precision of individual rational thought.
Only the individual thinks. Only the individual reasons. Only the individual acts. ~Ludwig von Mises
Ultimately, law serves as a barrier to genuine moral progress. By externalizing moral authority, it encourages dependence and discourages the development of individual reasoning skills. It fosters a culture of obedience rather than critical thinking, and subtly erodes the capacity for independent judgment. While it may offer a temporary illusion of order, it does so at the expense of true moral clarity. The ideal isn’t a better law, but a society where each individual embraces the responsibility of reasoning for themselves, rendering external rules increasingly obsolete. Law is not a pathway to reason, but a substitution for it, a fundamentally flawed attempt to legislate morality in the absence of individual enlightenment. Ultimately, laws and rules are best suited for guiding children, while adults should rely on the power of reason – particularly the nuanced and creative capacity of abductive reasoning – to navigate the complexities of morality and build a truly flourishing society.
Law is the shadow of reason; whereas children require rules from their parents to navigate life, adults instead use reason to guide their morality and decision making. ~Nathan Martin
Did you enjoy the article? Show your appreciation and buy me a coffee:
Bitcoin: bc1q0dr3t3qxs70zl0y5ccz7zesdepek3hs8mq9q76
Doge: DBLkU7R4fd9VsMKimi7X8EtMnDJPUdnWrZ
XRP: r4pwVyTu2UwpcM7ZXavt98AgFXRLre52aj
MATIC: 0xEf62e7C4Eaf72504de70f28CDf43D1b382c8263F
THE UNITY PROCESS: I’ve created an integrative methodology called the Unity Process, which combines the philosophy of Natural Law, the Trivium Method, Socratic Questioning, Jungian shadow work, and Meridian Tapping—into an easy to use system that allows people to process their emotional upsets, work through trauma, correct poor thinking, discover meaning, set healthy boundaries, refine their viewpoints, and to achieve a positive focus. You can give it a try by contacting me for a private session.