Has your depth ever been misunderstood to the point where you are personally shamed, judged, or attacked by shallow people? Getting misjudged, straw manned, and ridiculed by superficial and shallow people is a lot like children playing in a kiddie pool, where the children are judging a submarine navigating the depths of the ocean as if it was evil, mean, and scary due to its capacity and size. If such people lack any power over the person of depth beyond words, like those who are inhabiting positions of power and authority in a business or government, it can become quite dangerous and complicated to navigate. Why does this happen?
Narcissism is a personality trait marked by an exaggerated sense of self-importance, a constant craving for admiration, and a lack of genuine empathy, prioritizing appearances over substance. It manifests as grandiose displays or fragile self-esteem, heavily dependent on external validation to uphold a superficial image of superiority. This focus on outward perception often leads to manipulative behaviors to maintain a hollow sense of dominance.
Depth of character, at least from my personal experience, reflects a highly developed sense of Self, cultivated through introspection and resilience, embodying traits like Socratic humility, intellectual empathy, courage, autonomy, confidence in reason, fairmindedness, intellectual integrity, and perseverance. Socratic humility fosters self-awareness by acknowledging one’s limitations, while intellectual empathy enables understanding diverse perspectives, grounding the individual in authentic compassion. Courage, autonomy, and perseverance drive the pursuit of truth and personal growth despite challenges, supported by confidence in reason and fairmindedness, which ensure objective and principled decision-making. Intellectual integrity ties these traits together, ensuring consistency between beliefs and actions, resulting in a profound, authentic character that inspires trust and leadership.
Depth of understanding is the ability to grasp complex concepts, perspectives, and nuances with clarity, insight, and intellectual humility, often built through critical reflection and open-minded exploration. It enables individuals to navigate ambiguity, connect disparate ideas, and apply knowledge with wisdom and empathy in diverse contexts.
Some individuals cultivate a profound depth of character through introspection, resilience, and hard work, projecting authentic confidence, competence, and leadership. However, to a casual or judgmental observer, this depth can be mistaken for narcissism due to superficial similarities with the narcissist’s ability to mimic these traits. Both the deeply developed person and the narcissist may exude assertiveness and charisma, but while the former’s qualities are rooted in genuine self-awareness, the latter’s are performative, masking insecurity or a need for validation. This misperception raises the question: why might depth appear narcissistic to an untrained and/or shallow onlooker?
The confusion often arises from a lack of discernment in observers who fail to look beyond surface traits. A deep person’s confidence, earned through overcoming challenges and embracing vulnerability, can resemble the narcissist’s grandiose facade to those unfamiliar with their journey. Casual onlookers, especially those with a shallow approach to judgment, may reduce the deep person’s character to a caricature, straw-manning their authenticity as arrogance. This tendency is amplified when the observer’s own unconscious narcissistic traits—marked by envy or a need to feel superior—leads them to project their insecurities onto the deep person, labeling them as self-absorbed to deflect their own shame and discomfort.
[The Dunning-Kruger Effect, is] where a person believes themselves to be smarter and more competent than they actually are. […] In essence, it shows how people with low ability do not have the necessary critical ability and self-awareness to recognize how low their ability actually is. This leads to them having a superior view of their own competence and knowledge. In simple words, it is “when people are too stupid to know how stupid they are”. ~Kirstie Pursey
This misjudgment can be seen as a form of shallowness judging depth in a Dunning-Kruger-esque manner, where overconfidence in one’s own perception distorts reality, which can be exacerbated by one’s job title and/or status within society, especially if it carries any kind of power (for example, unconsciously believing that “I get to be judgmental because I have an official position that requires a gun”). Casual observers may miscontextualize or oversimplify the deep person’s confidence, failing to recognize its substance. However, other factors contribute to this dynamic. Cultural biases that favor an externalized version of humility over bold self-assurance often cast confident individuals as arrogant, while personal insecurities, particularly in those with narcissistic tendencies, can trigger envy or resentment toward authentic competence. These elements combine to create a lens through which depth is mistaken for narcissism.
Cultural norms play a significant role in this misperception, as many societies prize a false, externalized version of humility and view overt confidence with skepticism. A deep person, comfortable in their strengths, may challenge these expectations, appearing grandiose to those conditioned to equate boldness with self-aggrandizement. Narcissists exploit this cultural ambiguity by crafting personas that align with superficial ideals of success, further confusing observers who lack the insight to distinguish between earned confidence and performative bravado. This societal preference for understated behavior makes it easier for a deep person’s authenticity to be misread as arrogance.
The cultural emphasis on humility often conflates it with modesty, an externalized trait that prioritizes social approval over genuine self-awareness. Unlike Socratic humility, which involves deep introspection and acknowledgment of one’s limitations, modesty can be performative, lacking the substance of true humility. Shallow observers who value this superficial modesty may misjudge a deep person’s confidence as narcissistic because it defies their expectation of self-effacement, revealing their shallow understanding of humility’s deeper meaning.
The shallowness and hollowness of such judgmental individuals extend to their superficial grasp of humility, preferring modesty’s veneer because it aligns with their simplistic worldview. This preference allows them to avoid the discomfort of self-examination, which true humility demands. By favoring modesty, they maintain a framework that feels less threatening to their insecurities, making it easier to mislabel a deep person’s authenticity as narcissism. This hollow lens reflects their own lack of depth, as they project their values onto others without questioning their assumptions.
Personal insecurities and envy further complicate the observer’s judgment. Encountering a deeply developed individual can evoke feelings of inadequacy in those who haven’t undertaken similar inner work, prompting them to diminish the deep person’s achievements by labeling them narcissistic. When the shallow observer harbors unconscious narcissistic traits, this reaction intensifies; their need for validation drives them to project their own flaws onto the deep person, accusing them of the grandiosity they might secretly crave. This projection serves as a defense mechanism, allowing the observer to maintain their fragile self-image while dismissing the threat posed by authentic depth.
The interplay of these factors—shallowness (of character and/or insight), cultural bias, and personal insecurity—creates a perfect storm of misjudgment. Observers with a shallow approach reduce complex character to simplistic stereotypes, while cultural norms amplify their suspicion of confidence, unless it is of the unearned variety that they experience via their own Dunning-Kruger-esque attitudes and behaviors. Insecure individuals, particularly those with narcissistic tendencies, typically project their flaws onto the deep person, unable to tolerate the mirror of authentic competence. This dynamic underscores the importance of discernment in recognizing true depth.
To differentiate depth from narcissism, one must look beyond appearances to the individual’s substance and motivations. A deep person’s confidence is consistent, rooted in empathy and resilience, while a narcissist’s is fragile, dependent on external praise. Encouraging self-awareness in observers—through reflection or exposure to authentic role models—can help them recognize their biases and appreciate genuine character. For the deep person, understanding this dynamic fosters patience with misjudgments, trusting that their principled behavior will ultimately speak for itself.
Ultimately, mistaking depth for narcissism reflects a failure to engage with the substance of character. By addressing shallowness, challenging cultural biases, and fostering self-awareness, individuals and society can better distinguish between authentic depth and performative grandiosity. This shift not only honors those who have worked to develop their character but also encourages a deeper, more empathetic approach to understanding others.
Did you enjoy the article? Show your appreciation and buy me a coffee:
Bitcoin: bc1q0dr3t3qxs70zl0y5ccz7zesdepek3hs8mq9q76
Doge: DBLkU7R4fd9VsMKimi7X8EtMnDJPUdnWrZ
XRP: r4pwVyTu2UwpcM7ZXavt98AgFXRLre52aj
MATIC: 0xEf62e7C4Eaf72504de70f28CDf43D1b382c8263F
THE UNITY PROCESS: I’ve created an integrative methodology called the Unity Process, which combines the philosophy of Natural Law, the Trivium Method, Socratic Questioning, Jungian shadow work, and Meridian Tapping—into an easy to use system that allows people to process their emotional upsets, work through trauma, correct poor thinking, discover meaning, set healthy boundaries, refine their viewpoints, and to achieve a positive focus. You can give it a try by contacting me for a private session.
