Moving from religious conformity to internalized wisdom
Humanity’s search for meaning has long been channeled through the great edifices of organized religion. These systems offer structure, community, and a framework for morality, promising a guiding light in a complex world. Yet, for countless individuals, that promised light can feel more like a cage. When institutions demand adherence to rigid, unchallengeable doctrines, they cease to be tools for liberation and instead become instruments of control, trading the vibrant, messy work of genuine spiritual inquiry for the sterile safety of dogma.
Deductive rigidity refers to the strict application of fixed premises to reach conclusions, often stifling inquiry by treating those premises as unchallengeable, leading to inflexible and potentially flawed outcomes. In contrast, abductive reasoning offers flexibility by inferring the best explanation from observed facts, adapting to new evidence and context to align further with truth.
The core of this issue lies in a reliance on deductive rigidity—a mode of thinking that begins with fixed, sacred premises and allows for no conclusions outside of them. Whether rooted in the authority of a holy book, a papal decree, or an ancient tradition, this top-down approach shuts down the essential human faculty of open-ended reason. It tells us *what* to think, not *how* to think. This creates a “false light”: a system that mimics the appearance of wisdom and morality but is ultimately built on obedience to law rather than the cultivation of an individual’s sovereign Self based in Logocentric reason.
Christianity, in its dominant forms, serves as a powerful case study. From its earliest councils to its modern denominations, it has often prioritized doctrinal purity over personal discovery. The stories of Jesus—a radical individual who fully embodied the Logos and challenged the religious laws (legalism) of his day—have been codified into a new set of laws and legalistic practices. The vibrant parables, rich with layers of meaning, are flattened into singular, literal interpretations. To question the foundational premises is not seen as a brave act of truth-seeking but as a sinful lapse in faith often worthy of damnation. The system, in its effort to preserve itself, inadvertently quenches the very spirit of inquiry it ought to inspire.
But what if we were to approach this tradition differently? What if we viewed Christianity not as a religion demanding fealty, but as a profound mythology offering wisdom? To see a story as myth is not to dismiss it as false; it is to recognize its power as a vessel for symbolic, psychological, spiritual, and philosophical truth. A myth is a story we use to understand ourselves and our place in the cosmos. It is a map to be consulted, not a creed to be memorized.
We already do this with other ancient traditions. We study Greek mythology to understand the perils of hubris, the nature of creativity, and the tragic interplay of fate and free will. We no longer build temples to Zeus or offer sacrifices to Athena, yet we recognize the deep and enduring wisdom in their stories. By applying this same mature, analytical lens to the Christian narrative, we can unlock its transformative power from the prison of religious dogma.
The mind is an attribute of the individual. There is no such thing as a collective brain. There is no such thing as a collective thought. An agreement reached by a group of men is only a compromise or an average drawn upon many individual thoughts. It is a secondary consequence. The primary act—the process of reason—must be performed by each man alone. We can divide a meal among many men. We cannot digest it in a collective stomach. No man can use his lungs to breathe for another man. No man can use his brain to think for another. All the functions of body and spirit are private. They cannot be shared or transferred. ~Ayn Rand, “The Soul of an Individualist,” For the New Intellectual
Fallibilism is the intellectual character trait that acknowledges all beliefs and knowledge are subject to error and open to revision based on new evidence. It fosters humility and critical inquiry, encouraging individuals to question assumptions while pursuing truth through reason.
Abductive reasoning is a form of logical inference that starts with observations and seeks the simplest, most likely explanation, embracing uncertainty and iteration. It thrives on generating and refining hypotheses, often leading to surprising yet plausible conclusions, as seen in Sherlock Holmes’ investigative approach.
When we study Christianity as mythology, we don’t deny its power; we refuse to let it deny ours. No priest, pope, or pastor holds the keys to our individual conscience. Like Prometheus stealing fire, we reclaim the right to light our own way. Greek myth underscores the point. Prometheus’s fire is reason—our capacity to shape the world and ourselves. Pandora’s box warns that every gift, mishandled, spawns new problems; freedom without wisdom can unravel. The lesson is not to extinguish the fire but to learn to wield it—through fallibilism, testing, feedback, and responsibility. Abductive reasoning thrives here: we form hypotheses, compare them with lived results, and refine our understanding without shame for being learners.
Transactional Love is a conditional exchange where affection or care is offered with the expectation of receiving something in return, such as validation or reciprocation. It operates like a contract, driven by external motives and often tied to a sense of obligation or debt.
Non-Transactional Love is given freely without expecting repayment, rooted in genuine care and intrinsic motivation. It prioritizes authentic connection and truth, unbound by calculations or external rewards.
This mythological reading allows us to reinterpret the central symbols of the faith in a way that empowers the individual. Consider the crucifixion. In dogmatic religion, it is often presented as a cosmic transaction—a divine blood payment to settle a debt of sin. But as a myth, it becomes something far more profound: a symbol for the death of transactional thinking itself. The figure of Christ, as an embodiment of the Logos (divine reason), absorbs the ultimate consequence of a world trapped in a quid-pro-quo morality, not to glorify sacrifice, but to show a way beyond it.
Agape love is an unconditional love that seeks the highest good of others without expecting transactional reciprocation on one side, and self-erasure through sacrifice on the other, often considered a divine or spiritual form of love in Christian theology. Agape is the affirmative manner of saying “non-transactional“.
Examples of Logocentric character traits: Socratic humility, courage, empathy, autonomy, integrity, perseverance, confidence in reason, cultivated innocence, and fairmindedness.
His act, in this light, nullifies the very idea of a moral ledger kept by an external authority. It dissolves the framework of earning favor through obedience and avoiding punishment through compliance. The story liberates humanity from this spiritual bartering and points toward a higher morality rooted in agape—a non-transactional goodwill that flows authentically from a cultivated inner character. Actions become moral not because a law commands them, but because they are the natural expression of a humble, reasonable, integrated, and empathetic self.
Similarly, the resurrection is transformed from a historical event requiring blind belief into an eternal symbol of the human spirit. It represents our capacity to rise from the death of conformity, to overcome the tomb of outdated and limiting beliefs, and to be reborn into a life of self-directed (rational autonomy) consciousness. Each time an individual breaks free from groupthink, questions a limiting belief, and chooses to live with greater self-honesty and reason, they enact their own resurrection. It is a recurring testament to our ability to achieve renewal through relentless self-work.
This posture dissolves a common fear: that leaving religious certainty means entering moral relativism and nihilism. It doesn’t. Meaning is not a hand-me-down; it is a crafted life aligned with objective truth. We can honor the tradition as a treasury of tested insights without surrendering our agency to it. I’m not suggesting that we nuke Christianity, I’m suggesting that we remove the gatekeepers and Agent Smith’s that protect the Matrix and learn to co-create with the sacred texts in a principled manner. In that sense, tradition becomes an ally—a mentor we consult, not a warden we obey.
The ultimate aim of this spiritual evolution is to become what the myths have always hinted at: powerful creators. A powerful creator is an autonomous individual, morally accountable not to an external institution or deity, but to the principles of reason and life itself. They do not need a list of commandments because their well-formed Logocentric character serves as their compass, it is the “law written on their hearts” (Romans 2:15). They respect the rights of others not out of fear of divine retribution, but out of a profound self-respect that extends to all sovereign beings.
Let me tell you something you already know. The world ain’t all sunshine and rainbows. It’s a very mean and nasty place and I don’t care how tough you are it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain’t about how hard ya hit. It’s about how hard you can get it and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward. That’s how winning is done! Now if you know what you’re worth then go out and get what you’re worth. But ya gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain’t where you wanna be because of him, or her, or anybody! Cowards do that and that ain’t you! You’re better than that!” ~Rocky Balboa, Rocky V
The result is not the death of spirituality but its rebirth. The myth of Christ becomes an invitation to rise—again and again—from confusion, conformity, and guilt, into clarity, autonomy, and non-transactional agape based goodwill. We become powerful creators: people who think, choose, and build with eyes open; who respect the rights of others because we respect our own; who love without dealing in debts. The light we follow is the Logos within—reason tested by reality—hand in hand with empathy grounded in self-respect.
Did you enjoy the article? Show your appreciation and buy me a coffee:
Bitcoin: bc1qmevs7evjxx2f3asapytt8jv8vt0et5q0tkct32
Doge: DBLkU7R4fd9VsMKimi7X8EtMnDJPUdnWrZ
XRP: r4pwVyTu2UwpcM7ZXavt98AgFXRLre52aj
MATIC: 0xEf62e7C4Eaf72504de70f28CDf43D1b382c8263F
THE UNITY PROCESS: I’ve created an integrative methodology called the Unity Process, which combines the philosophy of Natural Law, the Trivium Method, Socratic Questioning, Jungian shadow work, and Meridian Tapping—into an easy to use system that allows people to process their emotional upsets, work through trauma, correct poor thinking, discover meaning, set healthy boundaries, refine their viewpoints, and to achieve a positive focus. You can give it a try by contacting me for a private session.
