But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law. ~Galatians 5:22-23 (NKJV)
Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. […] Therefore by their fruits you will know them. ~Matthew 7:15-18, 20 (NKJV)
“By their fruits you will know them” is a simple way of saying cause and effect governs moral life. Plant an apple seed, you get an apple tree; cultivate a certain kind of character, you get a certain kind of conduct and consequence. The list from Galatians—love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self‑control—names some of the kinds of outcomes a well‑formed person tends to produce. This is not magic, and it is not guesswork; it is a pattern that emerges when a mind honors reality and a will honors responsibility. Character is the root; actions are the branches; results are the fruit. If we want different fruit, we must tend the root.
Yet many communities treat doctrinal conformity as the fruit, as if reciting the right answers proved the tree was healthy. Creeds and “party lines” can be useful tools, but they are not a substitute for the lived qualities the text itself celebrates. You can tick every box and still be short on empathy. You can hold a minority view on a secondary issue and be rich in patience and self‑control. If “by their fruits you will know them” means anything, it means measuring what people actually do and become—not how well they mirror our doctrinal talking points. Doctrine should be tested by the life it yields, not the other way around.
Deductive rigidity refers to the strict application of fixed premises to reach conclusions, often stifling inquiry by treating those premises as unchallengeable, leading to inflexible and potentially flawed outcomes.
Abductive reasoning is a form of logical inference that starts with observations and seeks the simplest, most likely explanation, embracing uncertainty and iteration. It thrives on generating and refining hypotheses, often leading to surprising yet plausible conclusions, as seen in Sherlock Holmes’ investigative approach.
Fallibilism is the intellectual character trait that acknowledges all beliefs and knowledge are subject to error and open to revision based on new evidence. It fosters humility and critical inquiry, encouraging individuals to question assumptions while pursuing truth through reason.
This is where method matters. Deductive rigidity starts with fixed premises and treats them as untouchable, so questions become threats and learning stalls. Abductive reasoning does the opposite: it begins with observations, asks “what best explains this?,” and keeps its conclusions open to revision when new evidence arrives. Deduction remains valuable—but as a servant that stress‑tests our best current explanation, not as a master that forbids inquiry. Add fallibilism—the honest admission that we can be wrong—and you get a posture that protects truth by welcoming challenge. That posture grows people.
Logocentric character traits are the cultivated intellectual and moral virtues—such as Socratic humility, empathy, courage, and autonomy—that form the foundation of a disciplined mind, orienting an individual toward truth and principled judgment. They are called “Logocentric” because they place reason (logos) at the core of one’s being, ensuring that beliefs, decisions, and actions are consistently aligned with reality and ethical principles rather than being dictated by social pressure or unexamined feelings.
In Greek philosophy, the Logos is the impersonal, universal principle of reason that gives the cosmos its order and intelligibility. Christianity builds upon this by identifying the Logos as a divine person—Jesus Christ—the ultimate expression of God’s reason who became flesh, making the abstract, ordering principle of the universe tangible and knowable to humanity.
The fruit follows the tree, and the roots of the tree is your moral and intellectual character. When a person develops Logocentric traits—Socratic humility, courage, empathy, autonomy, integrity, perseverance, confidence in reason, cultivated innocence, fairmindedness—certain outcomes become typical. Such a person is less reactive and more deliberate; less status‑seeking and more reality‑seeking; less controlling and more principled. Agape love becomes active goodwill, not sentimental appeasement. Self‑control becomes strength that refuses both cruelty and cowardice. These traits are causes; the “fruits of the Spirit” are their predictable effects.
Substance is what happens when those traits are integrated so deeply that they shape you under pressure, not just in moments of comfort. Substantive character is not image management; it is earned solidity—the practiced alignment of thought, motive, and action. It shows up as consistency across contexts, the refusal to trade integrity for approval, the courage to set boundaries without aggression, and the humility to revise when wrong. Because it has weight and depth, substantive character produces fruits that are durable: love that does not enable abuse, joy that is not escapism, peace that coexists with responsibility, patience that is disciplined rather than passive. Substance turns virtues from slogans into reliable causes (cause and effect).
Individualism is the philosophy that prioritizes the autonomy, self-reliance, and unique identity of the individual, emphasizing personal freedom and responsibility grounded in reason. It values intellectual humility, empathy, and courage, enabling one to forge a principled path without dependence on external validation.
Collectivism is the belief that the group’s needs and goals supersede those of the individual, often demanding conformity to shared norms. It fosters arrogance, disconnection, and cowardice, as individuals seek group consensus to avoid personal accountability and self-examination.
If a relationship with God is truly personal, it must also be individualistic—shaped by conscience, context, and honest pursuit—not mass‑produced by social pressure. Communities that demand uniform answers at every stage drift into collectivism: the group’s comfort takes priority over the individual’s responsibility to think. The result is compliance without conviction. In contrast, a community of genuine unity centers on shared virtues and methods, not synchronized conclusions. It respects different paces and paths, trusting that honest inquiry under moral discipline tends toward truth.
Judging by fruit, then, is not license to pronounce on another person’s soul. It is a disciplined way to evaluate patterns of behavior and the methods behind them. The question is less “What doctrines do you believe?” and more “How do you handle evidence, reasoning, disagreement, and power? Do you revise when wrong? Do you keep your word? Do you respect boundaries?” Condescending formulas like “I’ll pray for your soul” can function as social weapons, not acts of care. They presume knowledge we do not have and trespass on another’s dignity. Do no harm includes refraining from that kind of false accusation.
Even when we evaluate outcomes, we must not confuse hardship with moral failure. A trial is not “bad fruit”; sometimes it is the very soil in which patience, resilience, and wisdom take root. Longsuffering only exists where there is something to suffer through. What matters is whether adversity is transmuted into clearer judgment and steadier love, or into bitterness and evasion. Judge over time, by patterns, with context. Practice mercy for persons and precision for behaviors.
A practical way forward is simple—and patient. Clarify the ends: a life of love, joy, peace, and the other fruits, achieved without initiating harm and without surrendering your agency. Observe your current fruit—habits, relationships, consequences—and include triggers and emotional upsets. Turn logic inward with abductive self‑reflection: ask what best explains your reaction, trace it to its roots, process the emotion, and neutralize the cause to heal the inner child. This yields intellectual, emotional, and psychological clarity so you respond rather than react, and it exposes biases—emotional reasoning and outcome attachments—that distort judgment. Identify gaps in Logocentric traits and strengthen them through deliberate practice over years, not quick fixes. Form hypotheses about the drivers, test small changes, use deduction to check them, and revise. In community, build accountability around method and conduct, and celebrate growth wherever it appears.
The promise is straightforward: good trees bear good fruit. If we cultivate substantive character—the kind with depth, not display—alongside a mind that loves truth, respects rights, and guards clear boundaries, the fruits named in Scripture cease to be wishful poetry and become everyday practice. Abductive humility keeps us teachable; principled courage keeps us free; empathy keeps us humane. Communities that prize substance over conformity will harvest better doctrine, better relationships, and better lives. Judge fruits, not souls. Tend the root, build substance, and the fruit will take care of itself as a natural consequence and effect.
Did you enjoy the article? Show your appreciation and buy me a coffee:
Bitcoin: bc1qmevs7evjxx2f3asapytt8jv8vt0et5q0tkct32
Doge: DBLkU7R4fd9VsMKimi7X8EtMnDJPUdnWrZ
XRP: r4pwVyTu2UwpcM7ZXavt98AgFXRLre52aj
MATIC: 0xEf62e7C4Eaf72504de70f28CDf43D1b382c8263F
THE UNITY PROCESS: I’ve created an integrative methodology called the Unity Process, which combines the philosophy of Natural Law, the Trivium Method, Socratic Questioning, Jungian shadow work, and Meridian Tapping—into an easy to use system that allows people to process their emotional upsets, work through trauma, correct poor thinking, discover meaning, set healthy boundaries, refine their viewpoints, and to achieve a positive focus. You can give it a try by contacting me for a private session.
