Can a “Private Company” Discriminate Against non-Mask Wearers?

I read on a friend’s FB timeline that a group of 20 plus liberty loving individuals went to a local Walmart in their area and all chose not to wear a mask inside. The manager asked them to mask up, but they politely continued on without masks, but when they went to the front to checkout, the manager had shut down all checkout counters and denied them service, and also called the police. When the police arrived, they explained to the liberty loving individuals that Walmart, as a “private business”, has the right to deny service to whoever they choose. I’m going to explain why this is not only poppycock, but also blatant discrimination against a specific class of people, and therefore immoral and a violation of people’s natural rights.

First, Walmart is NOT a private company, they are a public corporation traded on the stock market under the symbol WMT. Anybody can own a piece of Walmart, it is not in the hands of a private person or family, even if a family’s trust might own a majority share of it. Second, the whole “they’re a private company” argument only works if we’re in a decentralized free market economy, but if we’re in a centrally managed economy, meaning that there is corporatism, monopolies, government regulation, and backdoor deals with the government, it no longer applies. If these so called “private companies” being encouraged, and even paid, by the government to enact certain practices, which IS happening here in Holland, that’s by definition fascism, where the government is controlling the means of production with their subsidies and handouts.

Third, this new societal requirement was instituted without the consent of the people, having changed longstanding societal precedent on a whim, and is not grounded in actual evidence based science, but rather is based on unfounded assumptions that aren’t even allowed to be challenged or discussed, and if they are, people are silenced via the use of coercive tactics. While there may be tacit consent due to the so-called “mandates” being forced upon people, there is very little explicit consent being given by humanity, and there hasn’t been any fairminded negotiations, or for that matter, full disclosure about the reasoning, science, possible long term physical and psychological side effects, of wearing masks daily. Without a fair negotiation process and full disclosure by the party making the offer, any agreements made are considered fraudulent, especially when they’re made while under duress via coercion.

Lastly, let’s look at the concept of segregation and discrimination. Society is being segregated into two major categories, those who forfeit individual and bodily autonomy to an external authority, and those who choose individual and bodily autonomy as their own authority. In a free market, everyone may have equal access to all services, but the price of a particular good or service is what discriminates, and people get to decide what they do and do not want to purchase, and what they can and cannot afford; this provides equal access with unequal outcomes. However, in a segregated society, where segregation can occur due to superficial traits such as skin color, nationality, birth caste, or in this case personal medical decision making, there is unequal access to goods and services, even if a person does want to purchase it, and in spite of their ability to afford it. Those who refuse to forfeit their natural rights and bodily autonomy are being discriminated against, while those who choose to forfeit their natural rights are being allowed some semblance of normalcy.

To limit a person’s access due to a personal choice to not wear a mask or get a voluntary medical procedure is discriminatory, but beyond that, it is also considered criminal extortion, where according to Wikipedia, extortion means “the practice of obtaining benefit through coercion. In most jurisdictions it is likely to constitute a criminal offense […] Extortion is sometimes called the “protection racket” because the racketeers often phrase their demands as payment for “protection” from (real or hypothetical) threats from unspecified other parties.” In regards to our current situation, people are unable to use their hard earned money to buy goods or services, or in some cases even keep their jobs, which is their natural right, unless they “pay the extortion price” of wearing a mask or getting the experimental gene therapy shot. “Wear a mask, get the experimental jab, or else you cannot work or buy groceries” is textbook criminal extortion!

As you can see, excusing immoral behavior as the right of a “private company” is a thought terminating cliché and misdirection away from the actual underlying issues, intended to end rational thought and discourse, specifically that these businesses aren’t private companies, that we live in a decentralized free market economy without centralized government manipulation and intervention, that they have not obtained explicit consent to change societal norms, that there are unchallenged assumptions about the actual state of the world that people get punished for challenging, that people are being discriminated against for their individual choice to remain self-governing, autonomous, and personalized, and that they’re being extorted (via the use of coercive practices) into making choices that are not in their short or long term self-interests.

Police officers enforcing mask and jab mandates are essentially mafia-esque stooges working for those who have inverted the intended purpose of law, which was originally meant to protect the natural rights of the people, to instead enforcing the unlawful mandates instituted by the political elite and their monopolistic corporate overlords, and they’re using coercive and extortionary methods to ensure compliance. As Frederic Bastiat stated in his treatise “The Law”, and it’s as true today as it was in 1850 when he wrote it:

Unhappily, law is by no means confined to its own sphere. Nor is it merely in some ambiguous and debatable views that it has left its proper sphere. It has done more than this. It has acted in direct opposition to its proper end; it has destroyed its own object; it has been employed in annihilating that justice which it ought to have established, in effacing amongst Rights, that limit which it was its true mission to respect; it has placed the collective force in the service of those who wish to traffic, without risk and without scruple, in the persons, the liberty, and the property of others; it has converted plunder into a right, that it may protect it, and lawful defense into a crime, that it may punish it.

Here are some boundaries (in legal terms, a conditional acceptance) that you can set to regain a sense of personal power in these difficult times:

  1. I’m more than happy to wear a mask and take the jab when the one making the offer puts skin in the game and takes liability for any possible negative physical and/or psychological side effects that might result from my compliance.
  2. I’m more than happy to wear a mask and take the jab when the korona virus is actually isolated, and proven to be the cause of the symptoms that we’re being told are from the korona virus.
  3. I’m more than happy to wear a mask and take the jab when the one making the offer is able to conclusively prove their efficacy in preventing the spread of the korona virus.
  4. I’m more than happy to wear a mask and take the jab when the one making the offer is able to conclusively prove that they are safe for my individual needs as a human being.
  5. I’m more than happy to wear a mask and take the jab when critics of masks and jabs are given a full voice to share their concerns, and their concerns are fairly addressed and worked through with evidence based scientific means.
  6. I’m more than happy to comply with any store’s rules that make moral and rational sense.

Here are some affirmations that you can repeat to regain a sense of personal power in these difficult times:

  1. I can have full access to the goods and services that are within my means to purchase.
  2. I can claim my right to equal access to purchase goods and services, while retaining my natural rights and bodily autonomy.
  3. I can continue to make choices that are in my own short and long term self-interests.
  4. I can freely visit and shop at any store that I choose.
  5. I can be treated with dignity and respect when I go into public, regardless of my medical choices.
  6. I can exercise my natural right to freely engage in commerce.

More information about a conditional acceptance, a notice of liability, and the COMMERCIAL offer of kovid mania, see the following video:


THE UNITY PROCESS: I’ve created an integrative methodology called the Unity Process, which combines the philosophy of Natural Law, the Trivium Method, Socratic Questioning, Jungian shadow work, and Meridian Tapping—into an easy to use system that allows people to process their emotional upsets, work through trauma, correct poor thinking, discover meaning, set healthy boundaries, refine their viewpoints, and to achieve a positive focus. You can give it a try by contacting me for a private session.


[crypto-donation-box type=”tabular” show-coin=”all”]

About Nathan

Leave a Reply