Transactional Love is a conditional exchange where affection or care is offered with the expectation of receiving something in return, such as validation or reciprocation. It operates like a contract, driven by external motives and often tied to a sense of obligation or debt.
Non-Transactional Love is given freely without expecting repayment, rooted in genuine care and intrinsic motivation. It prioritizes authentic connection and selflessness, unbound by calculations or external rewards.
The word “transaction” originates from the Latin “transactio,” meaning “an agreement” or “completion,” derived from “trans-” (across) and “agere” (to act or do). It refers to an act of carrying out or settling an exchange between parties, often implying mutual action or performance.
Sin can be defined as an immoral act that willfully harms, sometimes through willful ignorance, another person and/or rebels against God by avoiding one’s moral responsibilities, such as the obligation to think, judge, connect, and behave responsibly, thereby creating a spiritual debt. It represents a deviation from ethical Logocentric principles, causing harm or neglecting one’s moral duty, which accumulates as a transactional debt that must be reconciled through a Logocentric means (Isaiah 1:18, John 3:16, Ephesians 2) to gain understanding in a transformative death and rebirth process.
Shame is an emotional state where an individual internalizes a sense of fundamental flaw or unworthiness, often expressed as “I am wrong” in the core of their being. It differs from guilt by targeting the self rather than a specific action, encompassing a pervasive feeling of disgrace or inadequacy.
Guilt, conversely, arises from recognizing a specific misdeed, encapsulated as “I did wrong,” focusing on the act rather than the person’s identity. It motivates remorse or a desire to make amends, remaining distinct from shame’s broader self-condemnation.
Self-worth is the intrinsic sense of value and respect one holds for oneself, independent of external validation or achievements. It reflects a deep understanding of one’s inherent dignity and the belief that one is deserving of love, respect, and fulfillment.
The crucifixion and resurrection from the Christian Easter story archetypally represents the death of the old self, symbolized by the suffering and death on the cross, confronting the shadow of human imperfection and sin. The resurrection signifies rebirth and renewal, embodying the universal archetype of transformation, where one emerges renewed, transcending limitations and accessing a higher state of spiritual wholeness. In alchemy, this is called transmuting lead into gold. Ideally, the initial act of humility where one accepts “Jesus into their hearts” is called being “born again”, and is a starting point for a continual step by step psychological death and rebirth process, symbolizing spiritual and psychological rebirth.
Over the Easter week, reflections on traditional practices sparked deep questions about love, self-worth, and sin, where sin is a form of spiritual debt. These observations prompted an exploration of why some love feels transactional, tied to external repayments, while other love flows freely, unbound by conditions. The contrast between depth of value—rooted in an internalized locus of identity and an archetypal understanding of reality and the world—and superficial value, marked by an externalized, superficial focus and understanding of reality and the world, provides a lens to understand this. It is my contention that depth of understanding and deep moral character fosters non-transactional love, free from scorekeeping, while superficiality breeds transactional love, driven by a need to offset perceived debts. This exploration seeks to promote a deeper philosophical, archetypal, and psychological perspective that liberates individuals from shame, guilt, low self-worth, and scapegoating cycles, encouraging a love that reflects inner abundance rather than giving love as a penance for feelings of inner unworthiness.
Depth of value, grounded in an internalized sense of identity, depth of character, an awareness of psychological archetypes, and the use of abductive reasoning for discerning deeper truths, nurtures non-transactional love by anchoring worth in universal principles rather than external validations. Individuals with this depth view sin as a shared human condition, often symbolized by narratives of Jesus’s one-time sacrifice that resets moral debt, over a dependence on sacrifice and penance as an ongoing value and process—that confronts the shadow of imperfection, initiating a death of the old self and a rebirth into a renewed state of wholeness. This perspective, akin to the resurrection’s promise of renewal, enables love to flow without expecting reciprocation, as self-worth is not tied to repaying shame or guilt through external acts. Non-transactional love, rooted in inner conviction, prioritizes connection and growth, offering resilience that endures beyond transient circumstances. It reflects a belief that worth is discovered within through a continual process of psychological rebirth, not something to be earned through performative transactions.
Superficial value, defined by an externalized locus of identity and a superficial focus on tangible acts, drives transactional love by linking worth to visible repayments of sin’s debt. Individuals with low self-worth, mistaking their inner lack for sin, may pursue external actions—rituals, sacrifices, penances, or approval-seeking—to prove their value to others, to God, and to themselves. This transactional love functions as a ledger, tallying acts to offset shame and guilt, perpetuating a cycle of debt and atonement that avoids the deeper transformation required to confront the shadow of imperfection. The superficial lens reduces sin to a personal deficit, demanding constant repayment through external means, unable to grasp its broader, archetypal significance as a catalyst for inner renewal.
The confusion between low self-worth and sin is pivotal, as both manifest as shame and guilt but differ internally at a deeper level. Low self-worth arises from a personal sense of inadequacy, while sin reflects a broader moral or spiritual debt that can be addressed through transformative understanding. Superficially, they appear identical, pushing individuals toward transactional solutions—penances or validation—to alleviate shame and guilt. However, low self-worth is a psychological barrier, not a moral failing, although it often leads to moral failings, and requires internal healing, not external acts of penance. Mistaking low self-worth for sin often fuels transactional love, where individuals strive to “pay” for their perceived unworthiness, unable to break free from shame and guilt’s cycle, when what they really need is profound inner healing and transformation.
This confusion also fuels scapegoating, where low self-worth and superficial values amplify destructive dynamics, causing legitimate moral failures (sin). Individuals with low self-worth feel unworthy, seeking external acts to prove their value. Conversely, those with grandiose self-images, like narcissists, perceive confident individuals with healthy self-worth as threats to their fragile egos. Labeling these individuals as “sinners,” “villains,” “dangerous,” or “prideful,” narcissists project their inner lack, a tactic seen in historical and modern scapegoating, such as the crucifixion of Jesus and cancel culture. The virtuous, with their high self-worth, are misjudged as arrogant, though their pride—understood as healthy self-respect—is a reflection of depth, not a flaw.
Codependent enablers, mistaking narcissists as victims, worsen this by siding with them to “rescue” them from the supposed aggression of those with high self-worth. This stems from a superficial lens that equates earned confidence with aggression, unable to discern the humility that’s embedded within authentic self-worth. Transactional love thrives here, as narcissists and enablers engage in exchanges—domination or appeasement—to offset perceived debts. Non-transactional love, rooted in depth of character and depth of understanding, disrupts this cycle, refusing to participate in scorekeeping or projection, offering love without demanding repayment (although it can still have high standards).
The notion of selflessness complicates this dynamic, as it can be mistaken for a solution to shame and guilt when it is often a symptom of low self-worth. Selflessness, often confused with the Socratic humility of knowing one’s limits, is transactional, where individuals negate their own value and worth to “pay” for their perceived debt through sacrifice. This is not healthy; losing oneself to shame and guilt reinforces low self-worth rather than resolving it. True health lies in cultivating internal value, where the self is affirmed, not erased. Transactions, in this sense, are superficial attempts to compensate for a lack of internal worth—a debt that cannot be paid through external acts alone.
We cannot solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them. ~Albert Einstein
The idea that even sacrifice is transactional, such as a divine act canceling humanity’s sin-debt, reframes selflessness and love. If a supreme sacrifice resets this debt at a level that is at least a layer deeper than the debt (similar to what Einstein implied), it creates a paradigm where internal depth provides an opportunity for individuals to transcend transactional cycles. Non-transactional love emerges when the internal depth of character and inner worth “writes the checks” for one’s love of others, trusting that the transactional debt is already paid for by the one-time payment from Jesus on the cross, enabling love to flow in a neutral manner—free from tallies or conditions. This “neutral love” reflects an inner abundance and worth, not a need to offset shame and guilt, aligning with the idea that worth is found within, not earned through externalized repayments.
Superficiality, however, remains trapped in transactional love, as low self-worth drives individuals to use external acts to compensate for an inner debt they cannot, and will never be able to, resolve. The belief that one must “do enough” to be worthy—through penance, selflessness, or sacrifice—perpetuates guilt and reinforces sacrifice as a virtue, where selflessness becomes a transaction to prove value. Depth, by contrast, internalizes the truth of a debt-canceling sacrifice by Jesus, fostering a love that transcends this false belief, offering connection and love without expectation of return, reflecting the renewal inherent in transformative acts like the resurrection.
Scapegoating thrives in superficial systems that mislabel healthy self-worth as arrogance, fueling transactional love. Narcissists, threatened by authentic depth, may cast those with earned confidence and self-worth as villains, while enablers reinforce this by vilifying them. This echoes in cancel culture, where high self-worth and depth of understanding is targeted as “bigoted” and “prideful,” mistaken for arrogance. Depth resists this by offering non-transactional love that refuses projection or punishment, rooted in an understanding of sin as a shared human condition that’s inherent in being born into a superficial society, therefore having a superficial character—and not a personal debt.
Liberation lies in embracing a deeper understanding of love and worth. By seeing debt as a universal narrative stemming from superficially engaging in morality, thinking, and relationships, individuals can heal low self-worth and move beyond transactional love. Non-transactional love, flowing from depth of being, breaks the chains of guilt and scapegoating, mirroring the grace of a debt-canceling sacrifice offered without expectation of repayment. This perspective affirms pride as healthy self-respect, distinct from arrogance.
The mislabeling of healthy self-worth as arrogance sets the stage for scapegoating, particularly when superficial systems prioritize literalist and externally focused metrics over internal depth. Transactional love, driven by low self-worth and a view of sin as a debt we must still pay, fuels cycles of blame and punishment, often targeting those who embody psychological and spiritual depth. In contrast, Jesus exemplified a non-transactional depth of love by paying humanity’s debt once and for all, liberating a shallow, transactionally minded humanity and offering access to a way of loving that refuses to demand repayment or project guilt. By internalizing the idea that God’s grace cancels sin’s debt, those with depth offer love as an expression of abundance, dismantling scapegoating and fostering connections that liberate rather than bind.
Did you enjoy the article? Show your appreciation and buy me a coffee:
Bitcoin: bc1q0dr3t3qxs70zl0y5ccz7zesdepek3hs8mq9q76
Doge: DBLkU7R4fd9VsMKimi7X8EtMnDJPUdnWrZ
XRP: r4pwVyTu2UwpcM7ZXavt98AgFXRLre52aj
MATIC: 0xEf62e7C4Eaf72504de70f28CDf43D1b382c8263F
THE UNITY PROCESS: I’ve created an integrative methodology called the Unity Process, which combines the philosophy of Natural Law, the Trivium Method, Socratic Questioning, Jungian shadow work, and Meridian Tapping—into an easy to use system that allows people to process their emotional upsets, work through trauma, correct poor thinking, discover meaning, set healthy boundaries, refine their viewpoints, and to achieve a positive focus. You can give it a try by contacting me for a private session.
