Claiming that it is transphobia, a supposed hate crime, to not date transwomen is both blasphemy against the Divine, as well as an inversion of morality, and I will explain why on both points.
First, whenever someone takes a subjective preference and elevates it to the level of objective truth, they are blaspheming against the Divine, because objectivity, reason, and truth are the realm of universal law and nature’s principles; it is a subjective person claiming their narrow understanding of reality is equal to a transcendent God’s immutable and objective laws. Who a person dates is a subjective preference because there is no objective victim being objectively harmed by an act of aggression, as there is a lack of an action with the so-called victim and not an act of aggression. To say that males must date biological women and non-biological transwomen equally is a positive right for transwomen, because now they are entitled to an action being done to them from a person who has their own unique set of subjective preferences, tastes, and sovereign volition to act as they please (as long as they don’t violate the non-aggression principle, of course).
Secondly, it is an inversion of morality precisely because exercising one’s preferences to not date somebody that they are not attracted to is an infraction against a positive right, which is an agreement/consent based privilege made between two parties, which entitles one party to a specific action by another party, and since no agreement between two parties was reached, there isn’t a breach of contract. To not date somebody one is not attracted to is not an objectively moral principle found in negative rights, as negative rights are one party’s freedom from aggression from other parties; it is the freedom to be left alone. In this context, a transwomen has the negative right to NOT be physically attacked, libeled, or slandered for their preference to behave and dress as a woman, and to NOT be assaulted for exercising this preference, and the person who chooses not to date them also has the right to NOT be attacked, libeled, or slandered for their preference to date biological women, and to NOT be assaulted for exercising this preference.
“Natural liberty, consists in the power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the law of nature. It is a state of exemption from the control of others, and from positive laws and the institutions of social life.” ~ Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language
“I say that man is entitled to his own happiness and that he must achieve it himself. But that he cannot demand that others give up their lives to make him happy.” ~Ayn Rand
I’m fairly certain that the push to shame and guilt straight men into dating biological men who behave as women is a way to trick people into a socialist mindset, which will then be transferred to actual practical socialism. This is because socialism, at least in Ayn Rand’s assessment,
“…is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good.”
Through this bastardization of subjective preferences masquerading as objective truths, AKA blasphemy, people are being tricked into believing that they have no right to exist for their own subjective preferences and happiness, and that they exist solely for the sake of another’s subjective preferences and happiness (which masquerades as universal law and objective truth), in this case transwomen. However, overall they’re being tricked into believing that they exist solely for the collective good, whatever flavor of the month that is the most politically and financially expedient for the oligarchs and technocrats who wish to be our lords and masters. To break free from this trap, we would need to claim our natural rights to enjoy and exercise our subjective preferences free from interference, and be willing to defend said rights if and when the use of force is used against us to enforce their subjective illusions.
THE UNITY PROCESS: I’ve created an integrative methodology called the Unity Process, which combines the philosophy of Natural Law, the Trivium Method, Socratic Questioning, Jungian shadow work, and Meridian Tapping—into an easy to use system that allows people to process their emotional upsets, work through trauma, correct poor thinking, discover meaning, set healthy boundaries, refine their viewpoints, and to achieve a positive focus. You can give it a try by contacting me for a private session.
Did you enjoy the article? Show your appreciation and buy me a coffee: