...where the Two become the One
Does the Conduct of the Guilty Dictate our Rights? The essence of the “weapon of choice” argument is that, because criminals and madmen use these guns to commit crimes, the law- abiding must give them up. But to ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and […] Read more »
By seeking judgment from the world, you consent to its jurisdiction. Here’s how to withdraw that consent forever. *Note: It may be helpful to read my previous article first, Logos vs Worldly Ethos, Christ vs Anti-Christ, prior to reading this one, although it is not necessary. As rhetorical devices from Greek philosophy, ethos establishes credibility through authority and character, pathos persuades through emotional resonance, and logos convinces through an appeal to reason and objective truth. While a society […] Read more »
Mandatory Submission: When Health Becomes the Ultimate Philosophical Fraud The recent era of biomedical statecraft revealed a deep philosophical and legal crisis that strikes at the foundations of Western liberty. At the heart of this collapse is a subtle but devastating inversion of the burden of proof, an epistemological error weaponized through the political application of germ theory. In any society governed by reason and natural law, a man is […] Read more »
Question: It seems that there is a dynamic where false accusations generate some sense of imagined or real power over others, where they are acting as the judge, lawyer, and sentencing authority all in one. For example, to accuse a friend or relative of wrongdoing without evidence and then punishing them for it by blocking all further contact, or by turning friends and/or family against them with dramatic certainty, but […] Read more »