The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools. ~Greek historian Thucydides
The archetype of the warrior is etched into the bedrock of human history, a symbol of courage and discipline. Yet, within this single image lie two profoundly different figures: the soldier and the philosopher-warrior. The former is a highly effective instrument of power, defined by their obedience. The latter is a sovereign mind, an agent of principle, defined not by the orders they follow, but by the truths they have reasoned for themselves. This distinction is the difference between a tool and a master of their craft.
Monological problems are questions that exist within a single frame of reference and are solved by applying a specific set of rules to arrive at one correct answer. Monological thinking is the mental process of approaching any problem, simple or complex, from only that one perspective without considering alternative viewpoints.
The conventional warrior, or soldier, operates through what can be described as monological thinking. They are masters of solving one-dimensional problems. Given a command—”take that hill,” “defend this post”—they execute it with precision. Their frame of reference is singular: the orders of their commander and the established rules of engagement. This mindset is essential for the function of a hierarchy, where success depends on predictable action and unquestioning compliance. The soldier’s virtue lies in their reliability as a component within a larger machine.
Multilogical problems are complex issues that must be analyzed from multiple, often conflicting, points of view and have no single, simple solution. Multilogical thinking is the mental skill of empathetically entering into and reasoning within these different perspectives to arrive at a more comprehensive and principled judgment.
However, the strength of monological thinking is also its greatest limitation. It provides no mechanism for evaluating the command itself. It cannot ask, “Is this hill worth the lives it will cost?” or “Is the cause I serve just?” Life, unlike a training exercise, is overwhelmingly multilogical—a web of interconnected challenges involving competing values and deep ethical questions. The soldier who cannot think beyond the mission parameters becomes a pawn, capable of great effect but possessing no control over their ultimate direction.
Herein emerges the philosopher-warrior. This individual’s primary allegiance is not to a person or a state, but to a set of rationally derived principles. Their defining characteristic is the capacity for multilogical thinking—the ability to engage with a problem from multiple perspectives, weighing its historical, ethical, strategic, and human dimensions simultaneously. They are not merely following a map; they are the cartographer, constantly re-evaluating the terrain and the destination itself based on a deeper understanding of the landscape.
This distinction echoes a timeless insight articulated by Aristotle in his Metaphysics: “For the wise man should give orders, not receive them; nor should he obey others, but the less wise should obey him.” This is not a justification for tyranny, but a profound observation on the nature of competence. The philosopher-warrior, through the rigorous cultivation of reason, becomes the “wise man.” Their authority to lead, and their moral obligation to do so, stems from a superior understanding earned through multilogical thought. They give orders not from a position of arbitrary power, but from a position of deep moral clarity.
The legend of King Arthur pulling Excalibur from the stone serves as a powerful metaphor for this cognitive leap. The challenge is not merely a test of physical strength; if it were, any brawny knight could have succeeded. The sword locked in the stone represents a paradox, a problem that cannot be solved within a single frame of reference. The stone is the world of brute fact, of “what is,” a monological reality. The sword, Excalibur, represents a higher-order concept: Truth, moral clarity, principled thinking and living, and the very principle of legitimate rule.
To draw the sword, Arthur must possess an added dimension to his Self. He doesn’t just pull on a physical object; he enacts a philosophical principle. His action demonstrates that he understands that true authority is not taken by force alone but is granted to the one who embodies a higher moral and rational claim. In that moment, Arthur solves a multilogical problem, proving he is not just another warrior who can wield a sword, but the “wise man” who understands why it should be wielded.
In this act, Arthur reveals himself as the Logocentric king. A Logocentric individual is one whose life is centered upon Logos—the Greek term for reason, truth, and the intelligible order of reality. Arthur, by claiming the sword of principle from the stone of fact, becomes the living embodiment of reason in his kingdom. He is the sovereign individual whose right to rule is synonymous with his alignment to a rational and moral truth. He brings order not simply by swinging a blade, but by wielding a principle.
The free man is a warrior. ~Friedrich Nietzsche
This establishes Arthur as a messianic figure, the “once and future king.” This title powerfully echoes the description of Christ as “the alpha and the omega,” a timeless and eternal principle. It suggests that the ideal Arthur represents—the sovereign, reason-based individual who leads through wisdom—is not a mere historical anomaly but an eternal archetype. It is the principle of civilization itself, which falls into chaos when it is absent and must be rediscovered and re-embodied by great individuals in every age.
You cannot give self-government to anybody. He has got to earn it for himself. You can give him the chance to obtain self-government, but he himself out of his own heart must do the governing. He must govern himself. That is what it means. That is what self-government means. . . . There must be control. There must be mastery, somewhere, and if there is no self- control and self-mastery, the control and the mastery will ultimately be imposed from without.” ~US President Theodore Roosevelt (At University of Wisconsin, Madison, April 15, 1911.) Mem. Ed. XV, 548; Nat. Ed. XIII, 594.
Ultimately, the journey from soldier to philosopher-warrior is one of profound self-development. It is the conscious decision to build a “Self” worthy of making its own choices. It requires the courage to question, the humility to learn, and the integrity to act on one’s reasoned conclusions. It is about forging one’s own Excalibur—an intellect so clear, principled, and integrated that it can cut through the stone of convention and complexity to reveal the path of a purposeful life, earning the right to lead oneself, and by extension, others.
Did you enjoy the article? Show your appreciation and buy me a coffee:
Bitcoin: bc1qmevs7evjxx2f3asapytt8jv8vt0et5q0tkct32
Doge: DBLkU7R4fd9VsMKimi7X8EtMnDJPUdnWrZ
XRP: r4pwVyTu2UwpcM7ZXavt98AgFXRLre52aj
MATIC: 0xEf62e7C4Eaf72504de70f28CDf43D1b382c8263F
THE UNITY PROCESS: I’ve created an integrative methodology called the Unity Process, which combines the philosophy of Natural Law, the Trivium Method, Socratic Questioning, Jungian shadow work, and Meridian Tapping—into an easy to use system that allows people to process their emotional upsets, work through trauma, correct poor thinking, discover meaning, set healthy boundaries, refine their viewpoints, and to achieve a positive focus. You can give it a try by contacting me for a private session.
