...where the Two become the One
PART I: Identity Over Truth There is a fundamental dividing line in the human experience, a crossroads where the trajectory of the soul is decided. It is captured in the realization that anybody who chooses their identity over the truth is a psychological child inside. This choice reveals a profound lack of will—specifically, the will to own one’s feelings enough to reflect on their own potentially contradictory nature. Instead of […] Read more »
In an era defined by limitless potential, we often find ourselves adrift in a sea of options, a state where the sheer volume of possibilities paradoxically hampers our freedom. We are bombarded daily with pathways that, while ostensibly valid, fracture our focus and drain our energy. It is not merely a question of choosing between good and evil; often, the struggle lies in choosing between the good and the harmonious. […] Read more »
In the annals of mythology and theology, there exists a resonant archetype: the figure who descends from the transcendent realm to emancipate humanity from the darkness of ignorance, only to suffer agonizing punishment by the ruling powers of the age. While the Greeks looked to Prometheus, the titan who defied Olympus, the Christian looks to Jesus, the Incarnation of the Logos. From a Logocentric perspective—where God is understood as the […] Read more »
In my previous examination of Pandora’s Jar, I dismantled the deceptive comfort of hope, exposing it as a passive tether that binds us to the reactive cycle of afterthought. To break free from this paralysis, one must adopt the mantle of Prometheus—the bringer of forethought. However, true forethought is not merely the intellectual exercise of predicting outcomes; it is an act of rigorous, spiritual, and cognitive alignment with reality, or the Logos. […] Read more »
Forethought, Afterthought, and the Trap of Passive Hope To live in alignment with the Logos—the divine ordering principle of truth—requires a rigorous devotion to cause and effect. It demands that we look at reality not as we wish it to be, but as it objectively is. However, the human mind is frequently divided between two modes of being: the active will of the planner and the passive reaction of the […] Read more »
In my previous explorations, I discussed the essential arts of “Verbal Aikido” and the weaponized use of the “Sovereign’s Persona.” These are not mere tricks of conversation or social affectation; they are fundamental strategies for psychological self-preservation. In a world that relentlessly seeks to probe, categorize, and emotionally compromise us, the ability to deflect and blend in is paramount. The chameleon’s skin is the psychological armor that allows the sovereign […] Read more »
In my previous article, “The Art of Verbal Aikido,” I explored the tactical mechanics of de-escalation—how to use superficial compliance—to protect oneself during hostile encounters within power hierarchies. However, the true efficacy of this strategy lies not just in the words used, but in the internal philosophical posture one adopts. To master this art is to understand that survival often requires a bifurcation of the self: separating the external performance […] Read more »
When is it moral to lie? We have all found ourselves in that suffocating dynamic: a question is asked, but it is not an inquiry. It is a demand for submission disguised as a question. Whether it is a family member attempting to reassert a childhood hierarchy or a bureaucratic figure seeking to “police the matrix” of social expectations and/or fiat laws, the intent is clear. They are not coming […] Read more »
In my previous reflection on the pre/trans fallacy, we explored how individuals attempt to bypass the rational work of character development to seize the fruits of spiritual maturity through force. However, to truly understand the mechanics of the controlling personality—whether it be the jealous partner, the envious peer, or the tyrant—we must identify the fuel source of this behavior. At the heart of this pathology lies a profound metaphysical error, a state […] Read more »
Ken Wilber’s pre/trans fallacy identifies a cognitive error where individuals mistake primitive, pre-rational states for advanced, trans-rational spiritual realization simply because both exist outside the rigid structure of conventional rationality. This developmental spectrum progresses from the pre-rational stage of subconscious instinct and undifferentiated emotion, through the rational stage of logic, boundaries, and objective law, and finally to the trans-rational stage of superconscious integration and sovereignty. A prime example of this confusion occurs in certain New Age circles, where […] Read more »
How 1 Samuel 16 and Matthew 5 Reveal the Logocentric Christian Path My treatise The Logocentric Christian presents a philosophical operating system grounded in Reason, Character, and Sovereignty. While it may appear as a modern synthesis, this commentary will demonstrate that it is, in fact, the profound unveiling of a rational truth long encoded within the Hebrew-Christian mythos. By constructing a theological bridge with two pivotal scriptural passages, we can see how […] Read more »
In the modern epoch, the collective consciousness has slowly drifted from the anchor of objective truth, drifting toward a seductive but ultimately destructive substitute: the idol of safety. When safety is elevated from a mere practical outcome to the highest moral virtue, it ceases to be a condition of well-being and becomes a jealous god. This idol demands a specific form of worship, and its liturgy is the systematic dismantling […] Read more »
The Law of Identity is the fundamental logical axiom stating that an object is identical to itself, succinctly expressed as “A is A.” It asserts that existence is determinate, meaning every entity has a specific nature and set of characteristics that make it distinctly what it is and not something else. The Law of Non-Contradiction states that contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time, meaning an […] Read more »
In the complex tapestry of human interaction, a fundamental tension exists between two opposing modes of judgment: one that is rigid, absolute, and unyielding, and another that is flexible, empathetic, and open to context. This conflict shapes our laws, our relationships, and the very fabric of our societies. It is the perennial struggle between the unbending application of rules and the compassionate extension of understanding. At its core, this is […] Read more »
The term “putting skin in the game” signifies a profound metaphysical commitment, extending far beyond mere financial risk. Within a Logocentric framework, it is the moral act of investing one’s very identity in an undertaking. This is not the gamble of the body-identified survival-ego, which stakes material possessions it fears losing, but the sovereign choice of a rational consciousness to accept the full causal consequences of its actions. To put skin […] Read more »